律师介入留置程序的正当性分析与制度设计  

Legitimate Analysis and System Design of Lawyer’s Participation in Supervisory Detention Procedure

作　　者：郭世杰 Guo Shijie(Department of Law,University of International Relations,Beijing 100091)

机构地区：[1]国际关系学院法律系,北京100091

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2020年第6期127-136,共10页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金重大研究专项“社会主义核心价值观融入国家安全法治建设研究”(项目编号:19VHJ003);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助项目“中国监察制度的改革与完善”(项目编号:3262018T22);北京市社会科学基金一般项目“党规与法律的协调机制研究”(项目编号:16FXB010)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：监察法并未明确律师能否介入留置程序。正当程序、权力制约和人权保障等理论是律师介入留置程序的理论支撑,宪法、刑事诉讼法等现行法是律师介入留置程序的法律依据。对集中统一、权威高效的监察体制的追求,并不意味一概拒绝律师介入的“堵”策更具可行性,而应当采取在设置门槛的前提下允许律师介入的“疏”策,并分别从律师介入留置程序的一般情形和例外情形、时间点以及相应的权利义务规则等方面在立法和制度层面上予以设计落实。The Supervision Law does not specify whether lawyers can participate in the Supervisory Detention procedure.Theories of due process,power restraint and human rights protection are the theoretical support for lawyers to take part in the procedure,while the current laws such as Constitution Law and Criminal Procedure Law are the legal basis for lawyers’intervention in the procedure.The pursuit of a centralized,unified,authoritative and efficient supervisory system does not mean that the“blocking”policy of refusing lawyers’intervention is more feasible,but should adopt the“dredging”policy of allowing lawyers to intervene under the premise of setting the threshold.And it shall be designed and implemented at the legislative and institutional level from the aspects of the general and exceptional circumstances,the time point and the corresponding rights and obligations rules of the lawyer’s intervention in the procedure.

关 键 词：律师 留置程序 正当性分析 制度设计 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]