论强制辩护的中国模式  

On the Chinese Model of Compulsory Defense

作　　者：董林涛 Dong Lintao(Institute of law,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100720)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所,北京100720

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2020年第6期159-166,共8页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2019年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“‘失范’与规范研究:刑事诉讼法应如何被解释”(项目编号:19YJC820008);中国社会科学院博士后创新基金项目“现实与愿景之间:刑事公诉制度改革问题研究”(项目编号:ZBH20191028)的阶段性成果;第66批中国博士后科学基金面上资助(资助编号:2019M660915)。

摘　　要：强制辩护具有保护被追诉人防御利益、促进法庭审判公平、确保国家刑罚权公正行使的功能,因而有建构之必要。司法解释通过限制被追诉人拒绝辩护权的方式对强制辩护制度进行了尝试。然而,从解释学的角度考量,相关条文的形式合法性和实质正当性不足,并存在不当扩充部门权力、限缩被告人权利的弊窦。在“刑事案件律师辩护全覆盖”的改革背景下,有必要改变司法解释的建构思路,在立法论层面提出契合中国现实需要的强制辩护制度。Compulsory defense has the functions of protecting the defense interests of the accused,promoting the fairness of the court trial,and ensuring the fair exercise of the national penalty power,so it is necessary to construct it.The judicial interpretation tries the compulsory defense system by restricting the accused’s right to refuse to defend.However,from the perspective of hermeneutics,the formal legitimacy and substantive legitimacy of the relevant provisions are insufficient,and there are also drawbacks of improper expansion of departmental power and limitation of the rights of the defendant.Under the background of the reform of“full coverage of lawyer’s defense in criminal cases”,it is necessary to change the construction idea of judicial interpretation and put forward a compulsory defense system that meets the needs of China’s reality in the level of legislation.

关 键 词：法律援助辩护 指定辩护 强制辩护 司法解释 拒绝辩护权 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]