“亚叙事”:90年代诗歌“叙事性”的反思式解读  

Sub-narrative:a Reflective Interpretation to the Narrativity in Poetry of the 1990s

作　　者：杨亮 YANG Liang(School of International Education,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian,Liaoning,116024)

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学国际教育学院,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《南京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期38-44,共7页Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology：Social Sciences

基　　金：2017年教育部人文社科基金项目“百年新诗‘跨文体写作’演进及形式伦理研究”(项目编号:17YJC751046)。

摘　　要：自20世纪90年代以来,诗歌的叙事问题一直是学术界热议的话题,从最初具有“革命性”的文本策略,到新世纪诗歌普遍将“叙事”视若圭臬的乱象,“叙事性”已然逃不过或被“捧杀”、或被“骂杀”的命运。如何以更为客观、理性的视角,恢复“叙事性”的话语活力则成为当下诗坛所必然面对的问题。“叙事性”最具“革命性”的本质在于其自我反思、自我否定的现代性,而“亚叙事”的提出正体现了“叙事性”自我反思的姿态。本文围绕“亚叙事”来展开,从三个维度——“诗的本质在抒情”、强调“叙事的过程”以及“综合的诗”来对90年代的核心诗学问题“叙事性”进行反思式的解读,希冀为诗歌艺术的形式伦理问题提供新思考。Poetic narrative has remained a hot issue in the academic circle since the 1990s.First regarded as a revolutionary word in the early stage,then a holy standard in the 21st century,narrativity now has gradually evolved into an object of either pious worship or scornful contempt.It is time to restore its original narrative vitality from a more impartial and rational perspective in the poetic academia.The most revolutionary nature of narrativity lies in its constant self-reflection and self-negation,which is precisely embodied in the newly-aroused term sub-narrative.This thesis focuses on an elaboration of sub-narrative from three perspectives,namely,lyricism as the essence of poetry,an emphasis on the narrative process,and the comprehensiveness of poetry.This is meant to provide a new reflection on the formal ethics of poetry.

关 键 词：90年代诗歌 叙事性 亚叙事 反思 

分 类 号：I052[文学—文学理论]