检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜雄柏[1] 史书[1] DU Xiong-bai;SHI Shu(Faculty of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105,China)
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第6期99-104,共6页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基 金:湖南省哲学社会科学规划课题“腐败犯罪量刑规范化问题研究”(18YBA417)成果。
摘 要:从中国裁判文书网所登载的2017年1月1日到2019年9月1日全国贪污犯罪案件判决书中随机抽取835份作为样本进行观察分析,发现我国对贪污犯罪适用缓刑存在随意性较大以及适用率偏高等问题。缓刑适用标准模糊、从宽量刑情节认定不规范以及司法人员个人素质不高是导致问题产生的主要原因。解决贪污犯罪缓刑适用存在的问题应当从制定明确且操作性强的缓刑适用标准、对从宽量刑情节的认定做出严格统一的规定以及加强对司法人员职务行为的监管等方面作出努力。From the sampling analysis of the written judgments of 835 cases of nationwide corruption crimes randomly taken from the judgment documents website of China from January 1,2017 to September 1,2019,it is found that there are some problems in the application of probation to corruption crimes,such as arbitrariness and high application rate.The main causes of the problems are the vague application standard of probation,the non-standard identification of lenient sentence circumstances and the low personal quality of judicial personnel.To solve the problems existing in the application of probation to corruption crimes,efforts should be made from the following aspects:formulating clear and operable standards for the application of probation,making strict and unified provisions for the identification of lenient sentence circumstances,and strengthening the supervision of judicial officers'duty behaviors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7