执行体制视野下我国参与分配制度之反思--兼与大陆法系参与分配制度相比较  

Reflections on the Participation in Distribution System in China from the Perspective of the Execution Mechanism--Comparing with the Participation in Distribution System in Civil Law Countries

作　　者：朱昕昱 ZHU Xin-yu(Law School, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期102-108,115,共8页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BFX002)。

摘　　要：我国和大陆法系参与分配制度因执行体制的差异而呈现出不同的运行样态。由于“个别式”执行体制阻断了执行机构了解债务人财产信息,因此大陆法系参与分配制度仅解决债务人特定财产的分配事宜,而不染指破产事务。非法人破产制度的阙如使我国参与分配制度承担着准破产职能。然而,参与分配的执行制度属性注定了其无法同破产制度相等同,且参与分配制度的存在排挤了破产制度的适用。在维系我国“概括式”执行体制的前提下,单纯就参与分配制度进行内部修改仍无法克服其根本性缺陷。因而,可以考虑不再保留参与分配制度,转而实行全面的执行优先主义和一般破产主义。Due to the difference of the execution mechanism,the participation in distribution system shows different operation patterns between China and civil law countries.Since the individual execution system blocks the access of the enforcement agency to the debtor's property information,the participation in distribution system in the civil law countries only deals with the distribution of the debtor's specific property,but not the bankruptcy matters.The absence of the unincorporated bankruptcy system makes the participation in distribution system in China undertake the quasi-bankruptcy function.However,the execution nature of the participation in distribution system determines its consistency with the bankruptcy system.In addition,the existence of the participation in distribution system limits the application of the bankruptcy system.On the premise of maintaining the generalized execution system,it is still impossible to overcome the fundamental defects of the participation in distribution system simply by internal modification.Therefore,it may be advisable to abandon the participation in distribution system but implement the execution prioritarianism and general bankruptcy doctrine.

关 键 词：参与分配 “个别式”执行体制 “概括式”执行体制 执行优先主义 一般破产主义 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]