检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜明 何筱天 吴多光[2] 敖翔 李洪胜 Jiang Ming;He Xiaotian;Wu Duoguang;Ao Xiang;Li Hongsheng(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510095,China;Department of Thoracic Surgery,Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510120,China)
机构地区:[1]广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院胸外科,510095 [2]中山大学附属孙逸仙纪念医院胸外科,广州510120
出 处:《中华生物医学工程杂志》2020年第1期62-66,共5页Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering
基 金:广州市医学重点学科建设项目;广州医科大学临床重点专科(202005)。
摘 要:目的比较下咽-颈段食管癌术后3种食管缺损修复方法的术后短期并发症发生情况。方法回顾性分析2003年1月至2013年2月中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院收治的下咽-颈段食管癌患者105例的临床资料,按食管缺损修复手术方式的不同分为3组:转移皮瓣修复术式为A组(n=45),全胃代食管修复术式为B组(n=32),管状胃代食管修复术式为C组(n=28)。记录3组患者术后并发症发生情况,包括肺部并发症、心律失常、胸胃综合征、切口感染、颈部肿胀、食管反流、吻合口漏、自动出院或死亡等。结果3组心律失常、胸胃综合征、切口感染、颈部肿胀、食管反流、吻合口漏等术后并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。3组组间两两比较显示,与A组比较,B组颈部肿胀、吻合口漏发生率较低,而心律失常、胸胃综合征及食管反流发生率较高;与A组比较,C组颈部肿胀、切口感染及吻合口漏发生率较低;与B组比较,C组心律失常、胸胃综合征、食管反流及吻合口漏发生率较低(均P<0.05);其他术后并症发生率组间两两比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论3种术后食管缺损修复方法中,管状胃代食管修复术式的安全性最高,且并发症发生率最低。Objective To compare the short-term complications of three esophageal defect repair options after surgery for hypopharyngeal-neck esophageal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 105 patients with hypopharyngeal-cervical esophageal cancer admitted to Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2003 and February 2013 were retrospectively analyzed.The subjects were divided into 3 groups according to the options of esophageal defect repair:group A repaired with free flap(n=45),group B with gastric pull-up(n=32),and group C with elongated stomach roll(n=28).Postoperative complications,including pulmonary complications,arrhythmia,thoracogastric syndrome,wound infection,neck swelling,esophageal reflux,anastomotic leakage,patient-determined discharge,and death were recorded and compared among the three groups.Results The three groups differed significantly in incidence rates of postoperative complications including arrhythmia,thoracogastric syndrome,wound infection,neck swelling,esophageal reflux,and anastomotic leakage(all P<0.05).By pairwise comparison among groups,group B experience less neck swelling and anastomotic leakage but more arrhythmia,thoracogastric syndrome and esophageal reflux compared with group A;group C experienced less neck swelling,wound infection,and anastomotic leakage compared with group A,and less arrhythmia,thoracogastric syndrome,esophageal reflux,and anastomotic leakage compared with group B(all P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the incidence of the rest postoperative complications between the any two groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion Among the three options of postoperative esophageal defect repair,elongated stomach roll offers the highest safety and the lowest complication rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145