检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐罗佳[1] 陈一芳[1] 王毓佳[1] 徐迎春[1] 王伟燕 李淑娴[1] 孙熠[2] 张园园[1] Xu Luojia;Chen Yifang;Sun Yi(The Children's Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine,National Clinical Research Center for Child Health;Center of Faculty Development Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Hangzhou 310000,Zhejiang,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院,国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心 [2]浙江大学医学院教师发展中心,浙江杭州310000
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2020年第10期6-7,共2页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:浙江省教育厅一般科研项目(Y201941256);浙江省研究生教育学会自筹课题(2019-022);浙江大学医学院教育改革立项项目(jgzd20201009)。
摘 要:目的:探讨TBL+PAL在儿科见习应用。方法:选择本校2016级临床医学214名学生为研究对象,对照组107名采用原有模式教学,实验组107名采用TBL+PAL教学,比较两组教学效果。结果:实验组理论、体格测量、操作得分高于对照组(P<0.05),临床思维无显著差异(P>0.05),问卷显示多数学生认可TBL+PAL教学法。结论:TBL+PAL教学法可改善儿科见习学习效果。Objective:To explore the application of TBL and PAL during clinical shadowing in pediatric department.Methods:214 clinical medicine majors enrolled in2016 participated in the study.107 took the conventional approach,while 107 used TBL and PAL.Results:The control group(n=107)used the traditional teaching method as prior.The experimental group(n=107)used TBL and PAL.Their learning outcomes were compared.Results:The performances of the experimental group in theory test,physical measurements,and procedure skills were better than those of the control group(P<0.05).The clinical thinking result showed no difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The questionnaire results demonstrated that most students in the experimental group considered TBL and PAL effective teaching.Conclusion:TBL+PAL could significantly improve the students'learning outcome of clinical shadowing.
分 类 号:G642.44[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.83.94