检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁可望 黄云 魏学鑫 余日跃 袁波[2] 李姗姗 Yuan Kewang;Huang Yun;Yuan Bo(Laboratory Animal Science and Technology Center,Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;Library,Science and Technology College of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Nanchang 330004,Jiangxi,China)
机构地区:[1]江西中医药大学实验动物科技中心 [2]江西中医药大学科技学院,江西南昌330004
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2020年第10期26-27,共2页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:江西中医药大学校级青年教改基金课题(2016jzqn-17);江西省青年科学基金(20161BAB215214);江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目基金(GJJ14624)。
摘 要:目的:探究实验探究法教学融入医学生动物伦理教育的效果。方法:实验组采用探究法教学融入实验动物伦理教育;对照组采取传统验证法教学,对比考察两种教学方法对学生实验动物伦理知识掌握和学习兴趣的影响。结果:实验组进行伦理学教育后,学生对实验动物伦理知识的了解和对实验的兴趣及独立思考能力有显著提高。结论:采用探究实验法教授伦理学相关知识,可有效提高学生的学习兴趣和能力,有助于伦理学知识的掌握,增强教学效果。Objective:To explore the effects of integrating experimental inquiry teaching into medical students'animal ethics education.Methods:Students in the study group were educated with medical ethics in animal experiments course using inquiry teaching method,while those in the control group received traditional teaching methods,and the effects of two teaching methods on students'grasp of experimental animal ethics knowledge and interest in learning were compared.Results:The students of the study group got improved interest in experiment and ability of independent thinking after experiment,which had significant differences compared with preexperiment and the students of the control group.Conclusion:It is a feasible way to integrate experimental inquiry teaching into medical students'animal ethics education,which improves their enthusiasm and ability to discover and solve problems and the gain of the ethics knowledge,greatly enhancing the teaching effectiveness.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143