检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王旭辉 任明亮 梁鸿 王昊 贺绪智 李兵 许明伟 陈颖 许民辉 周椿 徐伦山 Wang Xuhui;Ren Mingliang;Liang Hong;Wang Hao;He Xuzhi;Li Bing;Xu Mingwei;Chen Ying;Xu Minhui;Zhou Chun;Xu Lunshan(Department of Neurosurgery,Daping Hospital,Army Medical University,Chongqing 400042,China)
机构地区:[1]陆军军医大学大坪医院神经外科,重庆400042
出 处:《中华神经医学杂志》2020年第11期1085-1089,共5页Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81300965);军事医学高新技术培育项目(CX2019JS110)。
摘 要:目的明确伽马刀与显微外科手术在治疗三叉神经痛(TN)显微血管减压术(MVD)后复发患者中的疗效差异。方法选择自2011年1月至2018年12月陆军军医大学大坪医院神经外科收治的65例MVD术后复发TN患者进入研究,其中接受伽马刀治疗患者40例,接受二次显微外科手术治疗患者25例。采用美国Barrow神经研究所(BNI)提出的疼痛分级评价患者术后疗效及随访3年后疗效,Ⅰ~Ⅲ级定义为疼痛缓解。结果伽玛刀治疗组患者治疗后4~10周内面部疼痛逐渐减少直至消失。二次显微手术治疗组患者麻醉清醒后面部疼痛随即消失,或于随后1周内完全缓解。至术后第3年,随访结果显示,25例伽马刀治疗组患者中疼痛缓解17例(68.0%);17例二次显微手术治疗组患者中疼痛缓解16例(94.1%);2组患者疼痛缓解率差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.100,P=0.043)。伽马刀治疗组患者并发症均为面部麻木,发生率为24.0%;二次显微手术治疗组患者中出现1例偏瘫,余均为面部麻木,并发症发生率为29.4%;2组患者并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(χ^2=0.010,P=0.921)。结论对于MVD术后复发TN患者,二次显微外科手术及伽马刀治疗均安全有效,其中显微外科手术疗效优于伽马刀治疗。Objective To determine the difference of curative effects of gamma knife treatment and microsurgery on patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia(TN)after microvascular decompression(MVD).Methods From January 2011 to December 2018,65 patients with recurrent TN after MVD were enrolled in the study;40 patients received gamma knife treatment and 25 patients received secondary microsurgical treatment.Barrow Neurological Institute(BNI)proposed pain grading was used to evaluate the efficacies right after treatment and 3 years after follow-up in all patients,and grading I-III was defined as pain relief.Results Patients received gamma knife treatment had pain relief within 4-10 weeks of treatment and disappeared gradually;patients received secondary microsurgical treatment had disappeared facial pain immediately after waking up from anesthesia or completely alleviated facial pain within one week of treatment.Up to 3 years after surgery,follow-up results showed that 17 patients(68.0%)in the gamma knife treatment group had pain relief,and 16 patients(94.1%)in the microsurgical treatment group had pain relief;the difference in pain relief rate between the two groups was statistically significant(χ^2=4.100,P=0.043).Facial numbness was noted in the gamma knife treatment group,with an incidence of 24.0%;in the microsurgical treatment group,hemiplegia was noted in one patient and facial numbness was noted in the left ones,with complication rate of 29.4%;and the difference in complication rate between the two groups was not statistically significant(χ^2=0.010,P=0.921).Conclusion For patients with recurrent TN after MVD,secondary microsurgical treatment and gamma knife treatment are safe and effective,among which secondary microsurgical treatment is more effective than gamma knife treatment.
关 键 词:三叉神经痛 伽马刀 显微外科手术 显微血管减压术 复发
分 类 号:R749.16[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.102.106