征收中公共利益司法判断的新路径  

The New Approach to Judicial Judgment of Public Interest in Expropriation

作　　者：颜冬铌 Yan Dongni

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《政治与法律》2020年第12期132-145,共14页Political Science and Law

摘　　要：对于征收中的“公共利益”,在我国的司法实践中,为了应对由其不确定性所带来的判断难题,法院将征收制度框架中的其它合法性判断要素——规划和征收意愿,引入公共利益的判断中。这种法定判断框架之外的新判断路径,一方面是法院在方法运用上以体系解释填补文义解释局限性的尝试,另一方面,程序和民主要素的加入也实现了公共利益认定要素的拓展。法院对符合规划要求或多数被征收人已表示认可的征收决定在实体内容判断上保持尊重和克制,司法论证的重心也由此发生转移。这种新判断路径既是法院平衡对不确定法律概念的全面审查原则与司法尊重,又是可强化和充实司法论证内容的较好切入点。Regarding"public interest"in expropriation,in the judicial practice of China,in order to deal with the difficulties in judgment caused by its uncertainty,courts have introduced other elements for judging legitimacy in the institutional framework of expropriation such as planning and willingness to be expropriated into the determination of public interest.Such new judging approach beyond the statutory judging framework is an attempt by courts to break through the limitations of literal interpretation by means of systematic interpretation in terms of method application on one hand;on the other hand,the inclusion of procedural and democratic elements also achieves the expansion of elements for determining"public interest".Courts show respect and restraint in the judgment on substantive content of the expropriation decision in compliance with planning requirements or approved by most expropriatees and the focus of judicial argument has thus been shifted.Such new judging approach is a good breakthrough point for courts to balance the principle of comprehensive review of uncertain legal concept and judicial respect,and to strengthen and enrich judicial argument.

关 键 词：公共利益 不确定法律概念 司法判断 规划 征询制度 征收意愿 

分 类 号：DF74[政治法律—诉讼法学]