中美高校图书馆在线信息素养教育比较与思考  

The Comparison and Thinking of Sino-America University Libraries'Online Information Literacy Instruction

作　　者：王莲[1] Wang Lian(Library of Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048)

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学图书馆,北京100048

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2020年第22期135-144,共10页Library and Information Service

基　　金：北京市教育委员会社科计划重点项目“全球视域下在线信息素养教育的比较研究”(项目编号:SZ201910028009)研究成果之一。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]通过对中美高校图书馆在线信息素养教育(OILI)理论和实践的比较分析,探讨我国在线信息素养教育的相关问题。[方法/过程]通过文献调研、网站调研等方法,了解中美两国OILI的差异并进行分析。[结果/结论]中美高校图书馆OILI的主体内容相对一致,只是国内对某些内容的处理还有改进空间。中美高校图书馆均采用多种形式开展OILI,但差异较为明显。在对多种形式进行比较分析后,认为在线教程是卓有成效的OILI的形式之一。对国内而言,开展OILI,要有求实意识和精品意识;倡导在线教程,体现内容完整性与形式多样性;注重高阶技能培养,融信息、研究、学术于一体。[Purpose/significance]Based on the comparative analysis of the theory and practice of online information literacy education(OILI)in Chinese and American university libraries,this paper discusses the related issues of OILI in China.[Method/process]By means of literature research,website research and other methods,the paper tried to understand and analyze the differences of OILI between China and the USA.[Result/conclusion]The main contents of OILI of Sino-America university libraries are relatively consistent,but there is room for improvement in the treatment of some contents in China.University Libraries in China and the United States adopt various forms of OILI,but the differences are obvious.After a comparative analysis of various forms,it is considered that online tutorial is one of the effective forms of OILI.The paper proposes the suggestion as follows:Being both realistic and exquisite are important for the development of OILI.It is necessary to advocate online tutorials for the completion of contents and diversity in forms.It is also needed to pay attention to the cultivation of high-level skills,and thus promote the integration of information,research and scholarship.

关 键 词：信息素养 在线信息素养教育 OILI 高校图书馆 

分 类 号：G252.7[文化科学—图书馆学]