检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗维鹏 Luo Weipeng
机构地区:[1]西南财经大学法学院 [2]四川大学法学院,四川成都611130
出 处:《社会科学》2020年第12期100-110,共11页Journal of Social Sciences
基 金:中国博士后科学基金第67批面上项目“刑事证据分析方法研究”(项目编号:2020M673197)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:关于中国刑事证据法的基本原则,尚有多种学理认识。惯常认识尚未准确揭示证据法原则的特殊性及本土性。证据法原则如何界定取决于证据法的目的和中国的刑事证据法体系。证据法以在规范层面确立与证据审查判断有关的证明秩序为目的,在我国表现为证据规范、证明规范和推定及免证规范的基本架构。证据法定原则和保守推断原则是我国实然的证据法原则,有利被告原则可以作为应然的证据法原则。新的证据法原则有益于实现证明原理,规范证据立法,化解证明僵局。There are so many opinions on the basic principles of China’s criminal evidence law among the scholars,and the common understandings do not accurately reveal the particularity and native nature of the principles of evidence law.How to define the basic principles of China’s criminal evidence law depends on the purpose of the evidence law and the system of the criminal evidence law in China.The evidence law aims at establishing the order of proof that related to the investigation and judgment of evidence by the law,including the rule of evidence,proof,and the proof without evidence.The principles that the evidence decided by law and the conservative inference are the actual principles of evidence law in China.New principles of evidence law are helpful to realize the theory of proof,standardize the legislation of evidence,break the deadlock of proof.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175