被告人认罪认罚后反悔的几个问题——基于北京地区检察院、法院司法实践的分析  

Issues Related to the Defendant's Denial of the Guilt Pleaded

作　　者：樊学勇[1] 胡鸿福 FAN Xueyong;HU Hongfu

机构地区：[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038 [2]中国人民公安大学法学院,北京100038

出　　处：《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期193-208,共16页Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：2019年最高人民检察院检察理论课题《被告人认罪认罚后反悔问题研究》[项目编号:GJ2019019]。

摘　　要：被告人反悔案件表现出以审后反悔为主、反悔理由主观性较强、反悔的案由相对集中和辩护力量薄弱等特征。被告人反悔的诉讼主张很少被支持,还有可能诱发跟进式抗诉和上诉案件快审快办。被追诉人理应享有反悔权,但反悔权的行使也应当受到必要的控制,被告人反悔不能成为更换办案人员、排除有罪供述的独立理由。进一步分析发现,被告人反悔的原因包括被告人法律素养较低、辩护律师供给不足、办案人员释法说理动力不足、被告人反悔的成本低和法律规范不周延。规制被告人反悔需要增加具结书中应对涉案财物作出处理的规定、增加具结书中可以载明保留意见的规定、增加排除相关罪述等证据使用的规定、增加从宽减等制度、对为留所服刑的上诉案件作出裁决的时间要求和规范检察机关的法律监督。The defendant’s denial of the guilt pleaded normally occurs after the trial,featured with strong subjectivity,focus on certain cases and weak defense.As a consequence,more prosecutions might follow and the relevant procedures could be handled more quickly.It is argued that the defendant is entitled to the denial of the guilt pleaded but the exercise of this right should be controlled somehow.Also,the denial cannot be taken as an excuse for replacing the judiciary staff involved and removing the confession of guilt.It should be noted that more explicit provisions should be formulated in the verdicts on the handling of properties as well as the retention of guilty evidences,the increase or decrease of sentence,the time constraints for appeals and the supervision of procuratorial organizations when it comes to the defendant's denial of the guilt pleaded.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 被告人反悔 自愿性 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]