刑事被告人答辩制度在我国的构建研究  

Research on the Construction of Advocacy System of Criminal Defendant in China

作　　者：向昱洁 Xiang Yujie(School of Law,Hunan Normal University,Changsha Hunan 410081)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2020年第5期54-57,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：在我国刑事诉讼活动中,被告人权益的保护一直以来都被理论学界长期关注。由于在我国现行的法律中被告人答辩制度并未真正确立,很容易使案件的审理缺乏客观公正,进而引发冤假错案的发生。立足于我国刑事庭审活动的现实情况,积极借鉴美、法两国罪状认否、庭前提审等相关制度,以控辩平等、程序正义为价值导向,对被告人答辩制度实施的主体、类型、发起、方式以及救济等进行全面分析,并在此基础上提出自己的见解,以期推动被告人答辩制度在我国的全面落实。In China's criminal proceedings,the protection of the rights and interests of the defendants has been focused by the academic circle for a long time.Since the advocacy system of defendant is not really established in current law,it is easy to make unfair trial of the case,which will lead to unjust and false cases.Based on the reality of criminal court trials in China,it should actively learn from the relevant systems of the United States and France,such as the confession of charges and pre-trials systems,and take equal prosecution and advocacy and procedural justice as the value orientation,to conduct a comprehensive analysis of initiation,methods,and relief of the system,and put forward suggestions on this basis,so as to promote the full implementation of the advocacy system of defendant in China.

关 键 词：被告人答辩 控辩平等 程序分流 程序选择权 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]