检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘潇雨 LIU Xiaoyu(Law Department,Shandong Police College,Jinan 250200,China)
出 处:《鲁东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第6期77-84,共8页Ludong University Journal:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:《传染病防治法》和《突发事件应对法》构建了疫情防控法律体系的基本法律架构,以法律规范的全面性、统一性和明确性为衡量标准检视两法协调衔接现状,不难发现现行制度规范在疫情防控过渡阶段、应急响应阶段、疫情控制阶段均存协调衔接有待加强之处。应当从明确《传染病防治法》《突发事件应对法》适用范围、引入风险预防原则和比例原则、修改两法中立法冲突条款等角度加强两法协调衔接,进而促进疫情防控法律体系完备规范,实现依法防疫、依法治疫。Infectious Disease Prevention Law and Emergency Handling Law have constructed the basic legal framework of legal system for epidemic prevention and control.Taking the comprehensiveness,unity and clarity of legal norms as the criteria to examine the laws situation of coordination and connection,we can easily find that the coordination and connection of existing regulations and standards need to be further strengthened in the stages of transition,emergency response and control for epidemics.We should strengthen the coordination and connection of the two laws from the perspective of clarifying their application scope,introducing the principles of risk prevention and proportion,and revising the conflict clauses,so as to promote the perfection and standardization of legal system for epidemic prevention and control,and take the epidemic prevention and control by law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229