检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐超 XU Chao(Qianjiang Land and Resources Survey and Planning Institute,Qianjiang,Hubei Province,433100 China)
机构地区:[1]潜江市国土资源勘测规划院,湖北潜江433100
出 处:《科技资讯》2020年第31期76-78,共3页Science & Technology Information
摘 要:该文以RTK与常规全站仪在土地整理测量中的精度对比为研究对象,结合湖北潜江市某镇土地整理项目,探讨了两种测量方法的实施步骤,分析了二者的精度。结论表明,该方法避免了单纯的全站仪测量容易受到地形、植被覆盖等诸多因素的影响和RTK测量中卫星接收和外界干扰的问题,互补优缺,大大提高了作业效率,对加快工程进度,具有很大的实际意义。This paper takes the accuracy comparison of RTK and conventional total station in land consolidation survey as the research object,discusses the implementation steps of the two measurement methods and analyzes the accuracy of the two methods.The conclusion shows that the method avoids the influence of terrain,vegetation cover and other factors in simple total station measurement and RTK surveying Zhongwei.The problem of satellite receiving and external interference,complementary advantages and disadvantages,greatly improve the operation efficiency,to speed up the project progress,has great practical significance.
分 类 号:P228.4[天文地球—大地测量学与测量工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222