检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余晶晶 顾润环 李晓洁 刘红[1] Yu Jingjing;Gu Runhuan;Li Xiaojie;Liu Hong(The Department of Oncology,The Second People's Hospital of Huai'an,Huai'an 223001,Jiangsu,China)
机构地区:[1]淮安市第二人民医院肿瘤科,江苏淮安223001
出 处:《肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志》2020年第4期465-468,共4页Electronic Journal of Metabolism and Nutrition of Cancer
摘 要:目的探讨肠内营养与肠外营养对食管癌围术期患者的营养状况和并发症的影响。方法回顾性分析淮安市第二人民医院2017年1月至2018年6月食管癌手术治疗患者73例,根据营养干预途径不同分为全肠外营养组(TPN)23例和全肠内营养组(TEN)50例。TPN组给予静脉营养治疗,TEN组给予经鼻饲管(经鼻至空肠起始位置)肠内营养治疗。比较两组患者营养指标和免疫指标、术后肠道功能和安全性指标。结果两组患者就诊前后体重丢失、入院时血清白蛋白、淋巴细胞数组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TPN组血清白蛋白和淋巴细胞数不同时间点整体比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TEN组淋巴细胞数不同时间点整体比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术后组间比较,TEN组体重丢失幅度小于TPN组;TEN组术后72h、术后120h血清白蛋白均短于TPN组,TEN组术后120h淋巴细胞数高于TPN组;TEN组肛门排气时间和肠鸣音恢复时间均低于TPN组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组不良反应和不良事件比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对食管癌围术期患者而言,肠内营养的疗效总体优于肠外营养,且安全性无明显差异。Objective To explore the effects of enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition on the nutritional status and complications of patients with esophageal cancer during perioperative period Methods 73 patients with esophageal cancer during perioperative period treated in the Second People's Hospital of Huai'an from January 2017 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into 23 cases in total parenteral nutrition(TPN)group and 50 cases in total enteral nutrition(TEN)group according to different ways of nutrition intervention.The TPN group was given intravenous nutritional,and the TEN group was given enteral nutritional via a nasal feeding tube(through the nose to the beginning of the jejunum).The nutritional and immune indexes,postoperative intestinal function and safety indexes in the two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the weight loss,serum albumin and lymphocyte group between the two groups of patients on admission(P>0.05).The comparison of serum albumin and lymphocyte counts in the TPN group,and the comparison of lymphocytes in the TEN group at different time points showed statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The weight loss of TEN group was lower than that of TPN group,and the difference was statistically significant;Serum albumin at 72h and 120h after the surgery in the TEN group was lower than that in the TPN group,the lymphocytes at 120h after the surgery in the TEN group were higher than that in the TPN group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);The recovery time of anal exhaustion and bowel sounds in the TEN group were shorter than those in the TPN group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in safety between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For perioperative patients with esophageal cancer,total enteral nutrition is generally better than total parenteral nutrition,but total parenteral nutrition can quickly increase serum albumin levels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.135.221