民事速裁调解庭中先行调解的运行与反思  

Operation and Reflection of Pre-mediation in Civil Quick-decision Mediation Court

作　　者：刘青松 吕敏 LIU Qingsong;LV Min(Law School,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan,610207 China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期94-100,共7页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：四川大学法学院“研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神”专项研究课题资助项目“民事速裁调解庭中先行调解的运行与反思——以C市G区为样本”(sculaw20190320)。

摘　　要：为充分激活先行调解制度,从实践中发展出了以调解速裁团队统一组织先行调解的形式,其成效显著,但在过程中也出现了诸多问题:先行调解启动泛化,先行调解与现行财产保全制度存在冲突,增加当事人讼累,浪费司法资源,调解时限被虚置等。出现问题的原因在于先行调解规定过于模糊,未明确启动要件,同时将先行调解界定为立案前的调解。除弊兴利的关键就在于明确先行调解的启动条件以及将先行调解界定为立案后分配审判承办法官前的调解。In order to activate the pre-mediation system,a new form of mediation has been developed in practice,which is a unified organization of mediation by mediation and quick trial team,having achieved remarkable results.But there are also many problems,including the generalization of pre-mediation,the conflict between mediation in advance and the current property preservation system,the increase of litigants'litigation burden,the waste of judicial resources,and non compliance with mediation time limits.The causes of these problems lie in the following facts like the vague provisions of premeditations,and unclear start-up elements,together with defining pre-mediation as the mediation prior to filing the case.The key to eliminate the disadvantages and promote the benefits lies in clarifying the starting conditions of mediation and defining mediation as the mediation after filing a case.

关 键 词：先行调解 调解速裁团队 财产保全制度 立案程序 诉讼中止 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]