机构地区:[1]中国医科大学绍兴医院肿瘤内科,浙江绍兴312030
出 处:《中华肿瘤防治杂志》2020年第20期1669-1673,共5页Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(tyrosine kinase inhibitors,TKI)已经成为驱动基因阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的一线标准治疗,而TKI耐药的后线治疗则是临床研究的热点和难点。本研究探讨抗血管生成靶向药物安罗替尼联合培美曲塞+卡铂二线治疗TKI获得性耐药后晚期NSCLC的近期疗效和安全性。方法纳入中国医科大学绍兴医院2018-06-10-2019-02-01病理确诊为非鳞癌、TKI治疗后疾病进展、二次基因检测T790m阴性的ⅢB/Ⅳ期NSCLC 34例,依时间顺序用数字表法按2∶1随机分为研究组22例和对照组12例。研究组安罗替尼10(患者体质量<60kg)或12mg(患者体质量>60kg),口服,1次/d,用药2周停1周,同时联合全身化疗:培美曲塞500mg/m^2,持续静脉滴入20min,d1;卡铂AUC=5,持续静脉滴入2h,d1,21d为1个治疗周期,每完成2个治疗周期评价1次疗效,患者出现疾病进展(progressive disease,PD)则为研究终点计算无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS),或患者出现不能耐受的不良反应则退出研究继续随访至PD计算PFS。对照组单用培美曲塞+卡铂化疗。观察2组患者治疗总有效率(overall response rate,ORR)、疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)、PFS和不良反应。结果研究组和对照组ORR分别为54.55%(12/22)和25.00%(3/12),研究组有优势,而差异无统计学意义,χ^2=2.749,P=0.097。DCR分别为90.91%(20/22)和58.33%(7/12),差异有统计学意义,χ^2=5.040,P=0.025。中位PFS分别为6.7和3.5个月,差异有统计学意义,χ^2=12.085,P=0.001。常见不良反应包括骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应、肝肾功能异常和乏力等,2组比较差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。甲状腺功能异常、咯血、蛋白尿和口腔黏膜炎等不良反应研究组略高于对照组,差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。而高血压、手足综合征等不良反应发生率研究组明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义,P<0.05。1例Ⅲ级手足综合征、1例Ⅲ级口腔黏OBJECTIVE Tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs)have become the first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)cases with driver mutations,while further treatment after development of TKI resistance have been difficult and it is currently under intensive investigation.This study explored the short-term efficacy and safety of anti-vascular targeting drug Anlotinib combined with Pemetrexed+Carboplatin to treat TKI-resistant NSCLC.METHODS The subjects were 34 patients with StageⅢB/Ⅳ NSCLC who were admitted to Shaoxing Hospital of China Medical University from 2018-06-10 to 2019-02-01,diagnosed with non-squamous cell carcinoma,treated with TKI before but developed resistance,and T790 m-negative in the second genetic test.Using a random number table,the subjects were divided at a ratio of 2∶1 into a test group of 22 and a control group of 12.Treatment regimen for the test group was:Anlotinib at 10 mg(patient weight<60 kg)or 12 mg(patient weight>60 kg),oral,once a day,continuously for 2 weeks followed by a week gap;systemic chemotherapy with Pemetrexed at 500 mg/m^2,intravenous infusion in 20 minutes,d1,and Carboplatin to AUC=5,intravenous infusion in 2 hours,d1.The control group was treated with Pemetrexed+Carboplatin only using the same regimen as the test group.Efficacy was evaluated every 2 cycles until disease progression(PD).If a patient withdrew from treatment due to intolerable side effects,the patient would be followed up until PD.Overall response rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR),progression-free survival(PFS)and adverse effects(AE)were assessed and compared between the two groups.RESULTS The ORR of the test gruop and the control group were 54.55%vs.25.00%,the test group had advantages,but the difference was not statistically significant(χ^2=2.749,P=0.097),DCR was 90.91%vs.58.33%(χ^2=5.040,P=0.025);and PFS was 6.7 months vs.3.5 months(χ^2=12.085,P=0.001).Incidences of common AEs,including bone marrow suppression,gastrointestinal reactions,liver and kidney dysfunction,and fatigue,showed no signif
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...