行政协议中的情势变更——与严益州博士商榷  

Change of Circumstances in Administrative Agreement—Discussion with Dr.Yan Yizhou

作　　者：韩宁[1] Han Ning

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院

出　　处：《南大法学》2020年第4期62-81,共20页NanJing University Law Journal

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“政府合同管理立法研究”(18CFX025)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：行政优益权理论滥觞于学理,主要见于行政协议领域,且被我国的部分司法裁判肯认。情势变更制度植根于民法,仅为合同变更、解除的触发情形之一,与《行政诉讼法》《协议解释》中作为规范概念的单方变更、解除存在差别,不属于能够直接适用至行政法的一般法律制度。公共利益是行政协议单方变更、解除的触发点,单方变更、解除权仅由行政机关享有,行使单方变更、解除权之行为需要接受传统行政诉讼中的合法性审查。情势变更制度在行政协议诉讼中仍有适用之空间,在特定情形下,可循《协议解释》第27条“参照适用民事法律规范关于民事合同的相关规定”进入行政协议诉讼。The theory of administrative privileges originated from academic theory,mainly found in the field of administrative agreements,and has been recognized by some judgments.The rule of circumstance change is rooted in the civil law and is only one of the triggers for contract modification and termination.It is different from the unilateral change and termination as the normative concept in the Administrative Litigation Law and the Provisions of the Supreme People s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Administrative Agreement Cases.It is not directly applicable to administrative law.Public interest is the trigger point for unilateral modification and termination of administrative agreements.Only administrative agencies have the right of unilateral modification and termination.The exercise of unilateral rights of modification and termination leads to judicial review in traditional administrative litigation.The rule of circumstance change still has room for application in administrative agreement litigation.Under certain circumstances,it can be entered into administrative agreement litigation according to Article 27 of the Provisions of the Supreme People s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Administrative Agreement Cases.

关 键 词：行政协议 行政优益权 单方变更、解除 情势变更 民法典 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学] D922.1[政治法律—法学]