检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王硕[1,2] 吕静[1,2] 陈芳兵 李莉[2] 谈飞[1,2] 刘杰[1,2] WANG Shuo;LÜJing;CHEN Fangbing;LI Li;TAN Fei;LIU Jie(Department of Prosthodontics,Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University,Qingdao Shandong 266003;School of Stomatology,Qingdao University,Qingdao Shandong 266003,China)
机构地区:[1]青岛大学附属医院口腔修复科,山东青岛266003 [2]青岛大学口腔医学院,山东青岛266003
出 处:《中南大学学报(医学版)》2020年第11期1361-1367,共7页Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
基 金:山东省自然科学基金(ZR2018BH015);青岛市应用基础研究计划(19-06-02-45-cg);青岛市民生科技计划(19-6-1-51-nsh)。
摘 要:目的:应用电子束蒸镀的方法于纯钛表面沉积不同厚度钴铬合金涂层以研究其对钛瓷结合强度的影响。方法:将60个喷砂后的钛片(25.0 mm×3.0 mm×0.5 mm)随机分成实验组(A,B,C,D组)和对照组(E组)5组,实验组喷砂后通过电子束蒸镀的方式于表面形成不同厚度的钴铬合金涂层,其厚度分别为20 nm(A组)、40 nm(B组)、60 nm(C组)、80 nm(D组),E组仅喷砂处理。对电子束蒸镀完成后于纯钛表面形成的涂层进行扫描电镜(scanning electron microscope,SEM)观察及能谱(energy dispersive spectrum,EDS)分析,试件烤瓷后通过三点弯曲力学试验检测其钛瓷结合强度,瓷剥脱后进行SEM和EDS分析以及钛瓷结合界面的SEM和线性分析。结果:A,B,C,D,E组钛瓷结合强度分别为(36.11±1.17),(43.33±1.17),(39.95±2.22),(38.85±1.10)和(30.23±1.94)MPa。实验组钛瓷结合强度均高于对照组(均P<0.05),且高于ISO 9693规定的临床标准,其中B组(40 nm)的钛瓷结合界面结合紧密,无空洞及裂隙,钛瓷结合强度和钛片瓷剥脱后表面瓷粉残留高于其他各组(均P<0.05)。结论:通过电子束蒸镀的方式于纯钛表面形成适宜厚度的钴铬合金涂层可提高钛瓷结合强度。Objective:To investigate the effect of the deposited Co-Cr coatings on the bonding strength of titanium-porcelain restoration,Co-Cr coatings with different thickness were deposited onto the pure titanium substrate by electron beam physical vapor deposition(EBPVD).Methods:Sixty pure titanium specimens(25.0 mm×3.0 mm×0.5 mm)were randomly divided into 5 groups.Four Co-Cr coatings with different thickness,including 20,40,60 and 80 nm,were deposited onto the specimens(group A,B,C and D,respectively).Sandblasting treatment was selected as a control group(group E).After porcelain fusion,bonding strengths of titanium-porcelain restoration were measured by three-point bending test according to ISO 9693.Scanning electron microscopy(SEM)and energy dispersive spectroscopy(EDS)were employed to evaluate the morphology and elemental composition of both Co-Cr coatings and interfaces of the titanium-porcelain restoration.Results:The bonding strengths in the group E and the test groups(groups A,B,C,and D)were(30.23±1.94),(36.11±1.17),(43.33±1.17),(39.95±2.22),(38.85±1.10)MPa,respectively.In contrast to the group E,the Co-Cr coatings significantly improved the bonding strength between titanium and porcelain(P<0.05).Moreover,some cracks and pores were found at the titanium-porcelain interface in the group E,while the titaniumporcelain interface in the group B was tight and compact(P<0.05).Meanwhile,comparing to the group E,more residual porcelains were found on the substrate of group B(P<0.05).Conclusion:Co-Cr coating with appreciate thickness using EB-PVD could significantly improve bonding strength between titanium and porcelain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.189.148