使用盗窃刑事可罚性之肯定——以盗窃罪解释路径为检阅基础  

Affirmation of the Criminal Punishability of Using Theft——Based on the Explanation of Larceny

作　　者：王焱 Wang Yan(School of Information,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,School of Criminal Justice,Wuhan Hubei 430073)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《宁波广播电视大学学报》2020年第4期95-99,共5页Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University

摘　　要：使用盗窃是指意图一时使用,违背他人意愿而移转财物占有的行为。传统刑法理论对使用盗窃刑事可罚性持否定态度,但随着市场经济的发展,部分使用盗窃行为具有较为严重的法益侵害性,达到值得科处刑罚的程度。可通过盗窃罪修正的解释路径对使用盗窃可罚性进行检阅。客观上使用盗窃行为侵害了财物占有权与其他本权,是对狭义财物本身的盗窃;主观上非法占有目的具有区分轻微的不可罚使用盗窃与盗窃罪之机能,对其中的排除意思可解释为达到了可罚程度的妨害权利人利用可能性之意思,且不限于永久性排除占有。因此应肯定可罚的使用盗窃具有非法占有目的,对其能够以盗窃罪论处。Using theft refers to the act of transferring the possession of property against the will of others with the intention of temporary use.The traditional theory of criminal law holds a negative attitude towards the criminal punishability of using theft,but with the development of market economy,some of the acts of using theft have a relatively serious infringement of legal interests,which is worth the punishment.The punishability of using theft can be reviewed through the interpretation path of larceny amendment.The objective use of larceny infringes the possession right of property and other rights,which is the theft of narrow sense property itself.The subjective purpose of illegal possession has the function of distinguishing slight non punitive use of larceny and larceny,and the meaning of exclusion can be interpreted as the obstruction right to a punishable degree people use the meaning of possibility,and do not limit the permanent exclusion of possession,so we should be sure that the punishable use of theft has the purpose of illegal possession,and it can be punished as theft.

关 键 词：使用盗窃 盗窃罪 非法占有目的 利用可能性 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]