检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张兰[1] ZHANG Lan(Foreign Language Department,Mudanjiang Medical University,Mudanjiang 157011,China)
机构地区:[1]牡丹江医学院,黑龙江157011
出 处:《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第6期26-31,共6页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:黑龙江省省属高等学校基本科研业务费科研项目“体验哲学视角下文化迁移对英语习得反拨效应历时研究”(编号:2017-KYYWFMY-0696)的部分研究成果。
摘 要:随着人们生态意识的提升,生态语言学研究备受学者青睐,但多种研究范式并存且范式之间关联性不强使得学科统一性不明析。多世界理论在论证微观与宏观的同一性、在叠加态中谋统一的强大解释力使其具备解析生态语言学各研究范式间融合点,构建学科统一性的实力和基础。文章从多世界解释角度试析退相干的发生层面和多世界的分裂维度,阐释生态语言学多种研究范式并存的起因,分析各研究范式间割裂的机理,从而降解其显性退相干表象,揭示其隐性相干实相,期望有助于实现生态语言学学科内部真正的统一。With the development of people’s ecological consciousness, the study of Ecolinguistics has become more and more popular among scholars, but the coexistence of various research paradigms and their weak relevance make the unity of the subject unclear. Many-worlds interpretation theory tries to unify in superposition state,demonstrates the unity of micro and macro,and has the potential to disclose the unity of Ecolinguistics. This paper attempts to analyze the level of decoherence and the dimension of multi-worlds from the perspective of Many-worlds interpretation theory, explain the cause of the coexistence of various paradigms in ecolinguistics, and analyze the mechanism of the split of research paradigms, so as to degrade the explicit decoherence and reveal the implicit coherence, which is expected to contribute to the unity of Ecolinguistics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

