从“民族形式”论争到“赵树理方向”的历史考察  

Historical Investigation from the Debate on “National Form” to “Zhao Shuli’s Direction”

作　　者：牛婷婷 Niu Tingting

机构地区：[1]南京大学中国新文学研究中心,南京210023

出　　处：《中国文学批评》2020年第4期130-138,158,共10页Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism

摘　　要：《在延安文艺座谈会上的讲话》(以下简称《讲话》)通过将“大众化”的方向具体指为“为工农兵服务”,突破了以新文艺为“体”、以民间形式为“用”的思路,向投身革命的知识分子提出经由思想和艺术上的改造与工农兵群众完全结合,支持热爱他们“萌芽状态的文艺”的要求。而知识分子则从根据地的语境出发,将《讲话》关于“工农兵文艺”的制度设计转译为以“赵树理方向”为标准的民间文学运动。不同于以往由知识分子对于民间文学进行的单向改造,由《讲话》重启的民间文学运动呈现为“工农兵文艺”对于知识分子文学和民间文学的双向再造和融合。The Speech at the Forum on Literature and Art in Yan’an specifically refers to the direction of “popularization” as “service for workers, peasants and soldiers,” which breaks through the idea of taking new literature and art as “body” and taking folk form as “use,” and puts forward the requirement for the intellectuals who are engaged in the revolution to fully integrate with the masses of workers, peasants and soldiers through ideological and artistic transformation. On the other hand, from the context of the anti-Japanese base areas, the intellectuals translated the system design of the “literature and art of workers, peasants and soldiers” in into the folk literature movement with “Zhao Shuli direction” as the standard.

关 键 词：《讲话》 工农兵文艺 民间文学运动 赵树理方向 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]