论传统正义概念的困境及其扩展  

On the Dilemma and Expansion of the Traditional Concept of Justice

作　　者：龚群[1] 兰超 GONG Qun;LAN Chao

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院

出　　处：《哲学分析》2020年第6期109-119,192,193,共13页Philosophical Analysis

摘　　要：传统伦理学认为,正义是具有相互性的主体之间的权利与义务关系,正义理论可以通过契约论的框架来解释。然而,面对环境正义和代际正义问题,对正义的相互性理解受到挑战。传统正义概念的实质性内涵需要加以扩展:将相互性的有意志的主体关系扩展到无意志主体和不在场主体之间的关系;承认也不仅是意志主体之间,而且可以在意志主体与理由主体之间。traditional ethics holds that justice is the relationship of the rights and obligations between the mutual subjects,so the theory of justice can be explained through the framework of contract theory.However,in the face of environmental justice and intergenerational justice,the understanding about the reciprocity of justice should be challenged.Both environmental justice and intergenerational justice have a problem that traditional justice can’t answer:natural environment,as a party interacting with human beings,has no will,and future generations will not be able to appear.At the same time,the reciprocity of rights and obligations must be based on the recognition of the relationship between rights and obligations.The premise of the relationship between rights and obligations based on the contract is to recognize the rights and obligations of the other party.The major issue that we are facing is to expand the substantive connotation of the traditional concept of justice,and extend such a mutual and willful subject relationship to the relationship between the no-will subject and the absent subject.At the same time,this recognition is not only between the willful subject,but also between the no-will subject and the reason subject.

关 键 词：环境正义 代际正义 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]