检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任爽[1] 王冠忠 吴倩 REN Shuang;WANG Guanzhong;WU Qian(Surgical Ward for Colorectal Cancer and Anal Disease,Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University,Shenyang,Liaoning,110000)
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院结直肠肿瘤肛门病外科病房,辽宁沈阳110000
出 处:《实用临床医药杂志》2020年第21期12-14,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
摘 要:目的探讨失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)对直肠癌患者术后并发症及切口愈合质量的影响。方法将122例直肠癌手术治疗患者随机分为观察组和对照组,每组61例。对照组采用常规干预,观察组在对照组基础上采用FMEA干预,比较2组患者并发症发生情况及切口愈合质量。结果干预期间,观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,观察组切口愈合优秀率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对直肠癌术后患者采用FMEA干预能有效降低直肠癌患者术后并发症发生率,提高切口愈合质量。Objective To investigate the effect of failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA)on postoperative complications and the quality of wound healing in rectal cancer patients.Methods A total of 122 patients with rectal cancer treated by surgery were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 61 cases in each group.The control group received routine intervention,and the observation group used FMEA intervention on the basis of the control group.The occurrence of complications and the quality of wound healing were compared between the two groups.Results During the intervention,the incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).After intervention,the excellent rate of incision healing in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion FMEA intervention can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve the quality of wound healing in rectal cancer patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195