破坏油气管道设施犯罪罪数形态法律问题分析  

Research on Pattern for Quantity of Crime of Damaging Oil and Gas Pipeline Facilities

作　　者：孔卓然 KONG Zhuoran(Sinopec Petroleum Sales CO.,Ltd.,Beijing 100020,China)

机构地区：[1]中石化石油销售有限责任公司,北京100020

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期96-101,共6页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)

摘　　要：多年来,受暴利驱使,采取非法手段破坏石油天然气管道储运设施、侵占管道企业油气资产的犯罪行为时有发生。在实务中,由于公安机关、司法机关在破坏石油天然气管道储运设施犯罪的法律适用上认识不一致,导致此类案件在定罪和量刑上同案不同判的问题存在。在对破坏管道储运设施犯罪的罪数形态有关法律问题进行分析的基础上,建议应局部修正针对破坏管道设施行为危害公共安全的认定;修正破坏管道储运设施罪数类型的判断;将“牵连犯”修正为“想象竞合犯”,进而明确“从一重罪从重处罚”的处罚原则。Over the years, for extravagant profits, there have been frequent occurrences of criminal acts of destroying oil and gas pipeline storage and transportation facilities by illegal methods and misappropriating pipeline companies’ oil and gas assets. In practice, the inconsistent understanding of the law application for the crime of damaging oil and natural gas pipeline storage and transportation facilities in the public security organs and judicial organs have resulted in differences in conviction and sentencing of the same cases. Based on the analysis of the legal issues related to the crime of damaging pipeline storage and transportation facilities, it is recommended to partially amend the determination that the behavior of damaging pipeline facilities endangers public safety, modify the judgment of the crime type of damaging pipeline storage and transportation facilities, modify " the implicated offender" to "imaginary joint offenders" so as to clarify the principle of "heavier punishment for a felony".

关 键 词：油气管道储运设施 打孔盗油 罪数形态 

分 类 号：DF625[政治法律—刑法学]