检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田传浩[1] Tian Chuanhao
机构地区:[1]浙江大学公共管理学院
出 处:《中国农村经济》2020年第11期29-46,共18页Chinese Rural Economy
基 金:国家社科基金项目“宅基地使用权市场发育与增值收益分配研究”(编号:17BJY224);教育部后期资助项目“赋予农民稳定而有保障的土地财产权”(编号:17JHQ028)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:与重工业优先发展战略相匹配的农业集体化改造,最初的目标是耕地等生产资料的集体化,然而由于无法解决新增宅基地化公为私的困境,而不得不将宅基地所有权集体化,并由集体解决新增宅基地使用权分配,与宅基地具有类似特征的坟地也基于同样的逻辑被集体化。1956~1962年,宅基地名义所有权的集体化既非自上而下理性设计的结果,也非资源禀赋和技术变化导致的诱致性制度变迁,而是国家理性设计中遇到了难以处理的议题,而不得不进行的制度调整。The agricultural collectivization,which matched the priority development strategy of heavy industries in the 1960s,aimed to collectivize the means of subsistence including farmland at the preliminary stage.However,it could not solve the dilemma of privatization of newly increased rural homesteads.Therefore,the ownership of rural homesteads had to be collectivized and the use rights of newly increased homesteads were distributed by the rural collectives.This logic was applied to the collectivization of the ownership of rural graves too.The collectivization of the de jure ownership of rural homesteads during 1956-1962 was neither a consequence of top-down rational policy design,nor an institutional change induced by resource endowment and technological transformation.It was an institutional adjustment that had to be made because of the difficult issues encountered in the rational design.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.194.82