机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院儿内科,上海200025
出 处:《诊断学理论与实践》2020年第5期516-520,共5页Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice
基 金:上海市儿童健康服务能力建设专项规划(2016-2020年)。
摘 要:目的:探寻临床鉴别慢进展型中枢性性早熟(slowly progressive central precocious puberty,SP-CPP)与快进展型中枢性性早熟(rapidly progressive central precocious puberty,RP-CPP)的方法。方法:收集8岁前出现乳房发育的女童,行促黄体素释放素(lutropin hormone releasing hormone,LHRH)激发试验,定量检测血促黄体素(lutropin hormone,LH)、卵泡刺激素(follicle-stimulating hormone,FSH),同时采用定量试剂盒测定晨尿中LH和FSH。受检测者中53例被诊断为中枢性性早熟(central precocious puberty,CPP)。随访半年后观察其发育进展情况(生长速率、骨龄及第二性征发育等),分为SP-CPP(30例)和RP-CPP(23例)2组,比较分析2组间初诊时血和尿的LH、FSH以及相关参数的差异。结果:初诊血LH峰值、血LH峰值/FSH峰值比(以下简称LH/FSH峰值比)及晨尿FSH水平在鉴别SPCPP与RP-CPP中有一定的临床应用价值,而晨尿LH及晨尿LH/晨尿FSH比值在2组间差异均无统计学意义。与SP-CPP组相比,RP-CPP组具有较高的血LH峰值[(18.06±3.68)IU/L比(7.58±2.50)IU/L,P<0.001]和LH/FSH峰值比[1.67±1.08比0.97±0.43,P=0.014],而其晨尿FSH则低于SP-CPP组[(4.34±1.52)IU/L比(7.60±1.20)IU/L,P=0.007]。根据受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve,ROC曲线)分析,血LH峰值的临界值为9.68 IU/L时,大于等于该值时鉴别RP-CPP与SP-CPP的灵敏度为76.9%,特异度为87.0%;血LH/FSH峰值比的临界值为1.24,大于等于该值时,其鉴别两者的灵敏度为69.2%,特异度为73.9%;晨尿FSH的临界值为5.91 IU/L,大于等于该值时,其鉴别两者的灵敏度(76.9%)及特异度(78.3%)与血指标检测结果相似。结论:测定晨尿促性腺激素是一种无创且较可靠的方法,初诊时检测晨尿FSH,对早期CPP分型诊断有一定的辅助意义。Objective:To explore a approach of differentiating rapidly progressive central precocious puberty(RPCPP)from slowly progressive central precocious puberty(SP-CPP)in girls.Methods:Girls showing breast development before 8-year-old were enrolled.On the first visit,the lutropin hormone(LH)and follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH)in serum were quantitatively detected by lutropin hormone releasing hormone(LHRH)stimulating test,LH and FSH in urine were tested by quantitative determination Kits.Among enrolled girls,fifty-three were diagnosed as central precocious puberty(CPP).The patients were divided into SP-CPP(30 girls)and RP-CPP(23 girls)groups after 6 month-follow-up for pubertal advancement,height acceleration,and bone age maturation.The levels of LH and FSH in serum and urine as well as related parameters were compared between RP-CPP and SP-CPP groups.Results:Serum LH peak,the ratio of LH peak/FSH peak(the ratio of LH/FSH peak)and urinary FSH(UFSH)level showed reference value in differentiating RPCPP from SP-CPP,While morning urinary LH(ULH)and urinary FH/FSH ratio were not different between RP-CPP and SP-CPP girls.Compared with SP-CPP subjects,RP-PP ones had significantly increased serum LH peak[(18.06±3.68)IU/L vs.(7.58±2.50)IU/L,P<0.001]and serum LH/FSH peak ratio(1.67±1.08 vs.0.97±0.43,P=0.014)and decreased UFSH[(4.34±1.52)IU/L vs.(7.60±1.20)IU/L,P=0.007].The diagnostic efficacy of indices mentioned above were assessed with receiver operator characteristic(ROC)curve.It showed that the sensitivity and specificity of serum LH peak(cutoff9.68 IU/L)for differentiating RP-CPP from SP-CPP were 76.9%and 87.0%respectively,and serum LH/FSH peak ratio(cutoff value 1.24)were 69.2%and 73.9%.Morning UFSH(cutoff value 5.91 IU/L)for prospectively diagnosing RP-CPP had a sensitivity of 76.9%and a specificity of 78.3%,which had similar efficacy as serum LH peak and serum LH/FSH peak ratio.Conclusions:Quantitative measurement of morning voided urinary gonadotropin is a noninvasive and reliable approach to diagnose RP-CPP pro
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...