检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈晨[1] CHEN Chen(School of philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学哲学学院,武汉430072
出 处:《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第5期32-36,共5页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
摘 要:笛卡尔将不可怀疑、不可能出错的命题视为真理,并依此建立起了他的整个知识体系,而维特根斯坦认为这一知识体系的地基并不牢固,笛卡尔视为真理的命题也并不存在。他深入比较了“相信”和“知道”这两个词语在日常语言中的用法,证明了怀疑必须建立在相信的基础之上,错误必须建立在正确的基础之上,并最终揭示出笛卡尔语境下的真理只是在描述世界图景,其本身并非绝对为真,从而摧毁了笛卡尔知识大厦的地基,彻底批判了笛卡尔的真理理论。Descartes regarded the proposition that could not be doubted and wrong as truth,and he established his whole knowledge system based on it.However,Wittgenstein believed that the foundation of this knowledge system was not solid,and the proposition that Descartes regarded as truth did not exist.He compared the usage of the two words“believing”and“knowing”in daily language,proved that doubts must be based on belief,being wrong must be based on being right,and finally revealed that the truth in the cartesian context is only describing the picture of the world,which itself is not absolutely true.Thus the foundation of Descartes knowledge edifice was destroyed,and the theory of truth of Descartes was thoroughly criticized.
分 类 号:B521/B565.21[哲学宗教—外国哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229