内容和形式对毒品成瘾者条件推理的影响  

Impact of Content and Form on Conditional Reasoning of Drugaddicts

作　　者：曾晓青 何磊[1,2] Zeng Xiaoqing;He Lei(School of Psychology,Lab of Psychology and Cognition Science of Jiangxi,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022;Psychology Institute,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022)

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学心理学院,江西省心理与认知科学重点实验室,南昌330022 [2]江西师范大学心理研究所,南昌330022

出　　处：《心理学探新》2020年第6期524-530,共7页Psychological Exploration

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(19BGL230);江西省高校人文社科规划项目(XL17103)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本研究通过比较推理内容与推理形式对毒品成瘾者推理成绩的影响,以探究影响毒品成瘾者能力成绩的主要内在机制。实验采用了2(四卡片形式vs选择项形式)×2(描述性规则vs社会契约规则)混合设计,以240名男性戒毒人员为研究对象,考察他们在不同推理内容与不同推理形式下的条件推理作业成绩。结果发现:(1)就规则内容来看,描述性规则内容在选择项形式上的得分好于四卡片形式,社会契约规则内容在两种呈现形式下的成绩没有显著差异;(2)就规则呈现形式来看,四卡片形式下的描述性规则得分显著地低于社会契约规则得分;选择项形式下两类规则内容得分无显著差异。结果表明:毒品成瘾者的条件推理行为既受到推理内容的影响,也受到逻辑规则呈现形式的影响。In current study,the effect of content and form of reasoning on the reasoning capability of drug addicts is compared to investigate the main internal mechanisms that affect the reasoning ability of drug addicts.Thisstudy use a hybrid design of 2(four-card form vs option form)×2(descriptive rules vs social contrast rules).240 male drug addicts were used to examine their conditional reasoning performance under different reasoning content and different forms of reasoning.The result shows that:(1)in terms of the rule content,the score of descriptive rule content in the form of option was better than that of four-card form,and there was no significant difference in the score of the social contract rule content in this two forms.(2)In terms of two presentation forms,the score of descriptive rules under the four-card form is significantly lower than that under the social contract rule;there was no significant difference in the scores of the two types of rule content under the option form.The result showed:conditioned reasoning behavior of drug addicts is influenced both by the content of their reasoning and by the presentation of logical rules.

关 键 词：毒品成瘾 条件推理 四卡片形式 社会契约 

分 类 号：B842.5[哲学宗教—基础心理学]