向秀、郭象《庄子注》对读研究——以王叔岷《〈庄子〉向郭注异同考》为中心  

The Comparative Study of Annotations to Zhuangzi

作　　者：寇志强 KOU Zhi-qiang(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224002, China)

机构地区：[1]盐城师范学院文学院,江苏盐城224002

出　　处：《盐城师范学院学报（人文社会科学版）》2020年第5期35-44,共10页Journal of Yancheng Teachers University（Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“唐前《庄子》版本演变研究”(2019SJA1713)。

摘　　要：向秀、郭象《庄子注》公案一直是魏晋思想史研究的一个热点,但由于文献不足征,尚未形成共识。在诸多研究之中,王叔岷《〈庄子〉向郭注异同考》用对比研究法将其当时发现的所有向秀注佚文与郭象注文进行对比,以揭示二者关系。然王文以罗列材料为主,没有对所列材料进行综合分析,并不能清晰地揭示出二者的关系,且其归类有不尽合理之处,实有继续研究的必要。通过对王文所列材料进行研究发现,向、郭所用《庄子》版本不同,注书体例稍异,且文字完全相同者所占比例不高,更有郭注纠正向注的例证,故郭注当是对向注“述而广之”,而非“定点文句而已”。The Annotations to Zhuangzi were written by Xiang Xiu and Guo Xiang respectively,which have always been the subject of intense scholarly debate on the ideological history of Wei and Jin dynasties.However,due to the insufficiency of literature,the scholars can hardly reach consensus on this issue.Wang Shumin,a famous scholar in Taiwan,has made a comparison between the two versions.However,we need a more comprehensive analysis of the literature,a more clear clarification of the relationship between the two,and a more reasonable classification of the materials.Our research finds out that the version of Zhuangzi annotated by Xiang is different from that by Guo,with differences in the format and content.Guo even made corrections on Xiang’s annotations,which is an interpretation and expatiation of the work.

关 键 词：向秀 郭象 《庄子注》 王叔岷 文字对读 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]