单双音节动词“帮”“帮助”对比分析  

Comparative Analysis of Single-double Syllable Verbs"BANG"and"BANGZHU"

作　　者：唐青海 高再兰[1] Tang Qinghai;Gao Zailan(College of Liberal Arts,Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei 235000,China)

机构地区：[1]淮北师范大学文学院,安徽淮北235000

出　　处：《湘南学院学报》2020年第6期77-82,共6页Journal of Xiangnan University

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目(16BYY141)。

摘　　要：同素单双音节动词一直是学界研究的热点和难点问题。结合北京语言大学BCC语料库,从语义、语法、语用三个方面来考察“帮”“帮助”这一单双音节动词的异同点以及在句法环境中的互换条件。在词义方面:双音节动词的动作行为更具有目的性,单音节动词的语义虚化程度更高;在语法层面:单音节动词能带结果论元或者结果补语,双音节动词能带动词性短语;在语用层面:单音节动词偏口语,而双音节动词偏书面语。及物性强弱导致二者在作述谓成分时存在较大差异,指称性能力强弱导致二者在作主语、宾语、定语、中心语具有不可替代性。It is a hot topic and still a difficult question in the study of the homo-morpheme synonymous monosyllabic verbs.Based on the BCC corpus of the Beijing Language University,this article is to analyze the similarities and differences of"BANG"and"BANGZHU"of the two monosyllabic verbs by comparing the three aspects of the semantic,the grammar and the pragmatic.That is,in terms of word meaning:the action behavior of disyllabic verbs is more purposeful,the semantic deficiency of monosyllabic verbs is higher;in grammar level:monosyllabic verbs can bring result arguments or result complements,disyllabic verbs can promote part of speech phrases;Pragmatic level:monosyllabic verbs tend to speak,while disyllabic verbs tend to read.Therefore,the intransitive strength leads to the difference between the two in the description of the predicate components,while the referential ability leads to the irreplaceable of the two in the subject,object,attributive and central language.

关 键 词：单双音节动词 帮 帮助 对比 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]