糖源蜜、花源蜜和市售蜂蜜品质的比较研究  

Comparative Study on the Quality of Sugar Source Honey,Flower Source Honey and Commercial Honey

作　　者：董莹莹 迟增钊 迟玉森[1] DONG Ying-ying;CHI Zeng-zhao;CHI Yu-sen(College of Food Science and Engineering,Qingdao Agricultural University,Qingdao 266109,Shandong,China)

机构地区：[1]青岛农业大学食品科学与工程学院,山东青岛266109

出　　处：《食品研究与开发》2021年第1期48-54,共7页Food Research and Development

摘　　要：该文对糖源蜜、花源蜜以及市售蜂蜜(黑蜂雪蜜、洋槐蜂蜜、天然蜂蜜、紫云英蜂蜜)的水分含量、电导率值、色度、果糖、葡萄糖、蔗糖、pH值、游离酸、总酸和蛋白质含量等基本理化成分以及矿物质含量、淀粉酶活性、总酚酸含量、总黄酮含量等活性成分进行测定。结果表明:糖源蜜、花源蜜以及市售4种蜂蜜的基本理化成分含量均符合我国国家标准,表明这6种蜂蜜均为新鲜蜂蜜以及来自不同的蜜源;活性成分含量测定结果表明,除紫云英蜂蜜的淀粉酶活性没有达到8 mL/(g·h),不符合标准外,其他蜂蜜均符合,且糖源蜜的酶活性接近于天然蜂蜜,花源蜜的酶活性远远高于黑蜂雪蜜。此外,蜂蜜矿物质、总酚酸、总黄酮的含量因蜜源不同存在很大的差异。The article described the moisture content,conductivity value,color,fructose,glucose,sucrose,pH of sugar source honey,flower source honey and commercially available honey(black bee snow honey,artichoke honey,natural honey,milk vetch honey).The basic physical and chemical components such as free acid,total acid and protein content,mineral content,amylase activity,total phenolic acid content,total flavonoid content and other active ingredients were determined.The results showed that the basic physical and chemical components of sugar source honey,flower source honey and four types of honey were in line with China's national standards,indicated that these six honeys were fresh honey and came from different honey sources.The amylase activity of milk vetch honey did not reach 8 mL/(g·h),which did not meet the standard,other honeys were consistent,and the enzyme activity of sugar source honey was close to that of natural honey,and the enzyme activity of flower source honey was far higher than black bee snow honey.In addition,the content of honey minerals,total phenolic acids,and total flavonoids varies greatly depended on the source of honey.

关 键 词：糖源蜜 花源蜜 市售蜂蜜 理化成分 活性成分 

分 类 号：S896.1[农业科学—特种经济动物饲养]