网络犯罪侦查取证的正当性问题研究  

Research on the Legitimacy Issue of Cybercrime Digital Forensics

作　　者：许静文[1] XuJingwen(Criminal Investigation Police University of China,Shenyang 110854,China)

机构地区：[1]中国刑事警察学院网络犯罪侦查系,辽宁沈阳110854

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2020年第6期92-102,共11页Journal of Hubei University of Police

基　　金：2018年国家社科基金一般项目“新时代刑事司法改革视阈下国家侦查权重构与实现路径研究”(18BFX058)。

摘　　要：网络犯罪侦查的特点之一就是案件的线索和证据都具有虚拟性的特点,这就导致了取证虽然只是网络犯罪侦查的一个环节,但其作用和涵盖的范围却涵摄侦查的整体过程。网络犯罪侦查取证对象的变迁,电子数据不确定性对手段和目的带来的新要求,以及网络线索扩线的特殊意义,导致了实践中任意性侦查行为与强制性侦查行为相互交融、案外第三人诉讼权利保障缺失等问题。为了回应网络犯罪取证程序的现实困境,应对网络犯罪取证行为进行动态规制,除了严格规制手段和目的外,还应注重程序入口方面比例原则和数据收集最小化原则的适用,以及取证行为的动态规制。As for cybercrime investigation,one of its features is that the clues and evidence of the case are characterized by virtuality.Thus leads to the fact that cybercrime investigation and digital forensics is only a part of criminal investigation,but its influence can impact the overall investigation process.Due to the transition of cybercrime investigation and digital forensics,new challenges brought about by the uncertainty concerning electronic data and the special significance of cybercrime clues,corresponding issues have derived as the integration of arbitrary investigation behavior and mandatory investigation behavior,the lack of protection of third-party litigation rights as well.Hence,in addition to strictly limiting proper regulations towards means and ends,it is also applicable to focus on the proportional principle and minimization principle of data collection,and to pay attention to a dynamic regulation mechanism of forensic behavior in response to the cybercrime forensics realistic dilemma.

关 键 词：网络犯罪侦查 正当程序 取证 程序正当化 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学]