检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何勇[1] 杨将[1] 张小艺 王治 左小虎 洪莉[1] HE Yong;YANG Jiang;ZHANG Xiaoyi;WANG Zhi;ZUO Xiaohu;HONG Li(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430000,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学人民医院妇产科,湖北武汉430000
出 处:《机器人外科学杂志(中英文)》2021年第1期28-37,共10页Chinese Journal of Robotic Surgery
基 金:湖北省第二届医学领军人才工程[鄂卫通(2019)47号]。
摘 要:目的:比较机器人骶骨固定术(Robotic sacrocolopexy,RSC)与腹腔镜骶骨固定术(Laparoscopic sacrocolopexy,LSC)的临床疗效。方法:检索2020年3月前万方、维普、中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、Pubmed、EMbase、Cochrane Library以及Scopus等数据库公开发表的关于RSC和LSC临床疗效比较的研究,采用Cochrane RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入18篇文献,收集病例2 472例,其中RSC组1 134例,LSC组1 338例。Meta分析结果显示,RSC组手术时间较LSC组长(WMD=37.35,95%CI=24.46~50.24,P<0.00001),术中出血量较LSC组少(WMD=-58.48,95%CI=-100.58~-16.39,P=0.006),腔镜中转率较LSC组低(OR=0.35,95%CI=0.15~0.79,P=0.01),两组在平均住院日、术中并发症、术后并发症、盆腔器官脱垂(Pelvic organ prolapse,POP)治愈率和客观复发的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:RSC和LSC均具有高治愈率和低复发的临床疗效,而RSC在手术精细化操作和安全性方面更具有优势,在临床中有较大的应用前景。Objective:To compare the clinical effects between robotic sacrocolpopexy(RSC)and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy(LSC)with meta-analysis.Methods:A literature search was performed in WANFANG Data,CQVIP Data,CNKI data,China Biomedical Literature Database(CBM),Pubmed,EMbase,Cochrane Library and Scopus database for clinical researches published on comparison between RSC and LSC before March 2020.Results:18 literatures were included in this study and a total of 2472 cases were collected,including 1134 cases of RSC and 1338 cases of LSC.The results shows that RSC group has longer operation time(WMD=37.35,95%CI=24.46~50.24,P<0.00001),less intraoperative blood loss(WMD=-58.48,95%CI=-100.58~-16.39,P=0.006)and lower conversion rate(OR=0.35,95%CI=0.15~0.79,P=0.01)comparing with LSC group.No significant differences on hospital stay,intraoperative complications,postoperative complications,POP cure rate and objective recurrence between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:RSC has the high cure rate and low recurrence same as LSC,it is superior to LSC in fine operation and surgical safety,which has great application prospects in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28