检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:战强 任伟 韩为清 ZHAN Qiang;REN Wei;HAN Wei-qing(Department of Interventional radiology;Department of Geriatrics,3.nuclear magnetic resonance;The Fifth People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province,Xining 810000,China)
机构地区:[1]青海省第五人民医院放射介入科,西宁810000 [2]青海省第五人民医院老年科,西宁810000 [3]青海省第五人民医院核磁共振,西宁810000
出 处:《肝脏》2020年第11期1171-1174,共4页Chinese Hepatology
基 金:青海省卫生厅医药卫生重点课题(2017-wjzd-04)。
摘 要:目的探讨血管栓塞部位与肝癌介入栓塞(TACE)治疗后胆管损伤的相关性。方法纳入我院2018年10月至2019年6月收治的肝癌患者108例,所有病例均行TACE术。根据血管栓塞部位进行分组,分别为肿瘤供应血管组(A组,n=35)、左肝动脉组(B组,n=22)、右肝动脉组(C组,n=25)、肝固有动脉组(D组,n=26)。比较四组的胆管损伤发生率,并分析胆管损伤部位。经Logistic线性回归模型分析胆管损伤的危险因素。结果A、B、C、D各组胆管损伤发生率分别为14.29%(5/35)、9.09%(2/22)、8.00%(2/25)、11.54%(3/26),四组比较无差异(P>0.05)。在108例患者中,共计12例发生胆管损伤,胆管损伤数目为21个,A、B、C、D各组损伤数目分别为8(38.09%)个、3(14.29%)个、4(19.05%)个、6(28.57%)个。A组损伤部位靠近肿瘤4个,未靠近肿瘤1个,B组损伤部位均位于I段,C组损伤部位均位于V段,D组损伤部位均位于肝门部。Logistic多因素分析提示肿瘤少血供、TACE部位靠近胆管是TACE术后胆管损伤的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论肝癌患者于肿瘤供应血管、左肝动脉、右肝动脉、肝固有动脉处行介入栓塞时,对胆管损伤风险未见明显影响,但介入栓塞部位靠近胆管时,可增加胆管损伤风险。Objective To explore the correlation between the site of vascular embolization and bile duct injury after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)therapy in liver cancer patients.Methods 108 cases of liver cancer patients underwent TACE were divided into three groups according to the location of embolization:tumor supply vascular group(group A,n=35),left hepatic artery group(group B,n=22),right hepatic artery group(Group C,n=25),and hepatic proper artery group(Group D,n=26).The incidence of bile duct injury was compared among the four groups,and the location of bile duct injury was analyzed.The risk factors of bile duct injury were analyzed by logistic linear regression model.Results The incidence of bile duct injury in group A,B,C and D was 14.29%(5/35),9.09%(2/22),8.00%(2/25)and 11.54%(3/26),respectively,without difference among the four groups(P>0.05).Among the 108 patients,a total of 12 had bile duct injuries,and the number of bile duct injuries was 21.The number of injuries in groups A,B,C and D was 8(38.09%),3(14.29%),4(19.05%),and 6(28.57%),respectively.In group A,4 injury sites were close to the tumor and 1 wasn’t.In group B,all injury sites were located at segment I.In group C,all injury sites were located at segment V.In group D,all injury sites were located at hilum.Logistic multivariate analysis suggested that low blood supply and TACE site proximity to bile duct were risk factors for bile duct injury after TACE(P<0.05).Conclusion Interventional embolization at tumor supply vessels,left hepatic artery,right hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery of liver cancer patients weren’t associated with the risk of bile duct injury.However,the risk of bile duct injury increased if the embolization site was close to the bile duct.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.136.254