检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪洋[1] Hong Yang(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,Hubei 430073,China)
出 处:《上海公安学院学报》2020年第6期57-64,共8页Journal of Shanghai Police College
摘 要:我国目前的网络取证活动尚未摆脱传统证据调查思维与取证模式的束缚,其逐渐陷入了"专门知识的人"取证能力规范存在疏漏、取证程序规范不明晰、取证方法与标准规范不合理等立法缺憾的藩篱。为了保障网络取证活动的合法性与有效性,赋予收集的电子数据以证据能力与较强的证明力,应从基本原则与具体规则两个方面对现阶段的立法予以完善,使网络取证获得专业化人员的共同推动、可操作性程序的支撑与科学性标准的检验。The current network forensics activities in China have not yet gotten rid of the shackles of the traditional evidence investigation thinking and evidence collection mode,and gradually fall into the legislative deficiencies such as the omission of the"specialized person"evidence collection ability standard,unclear evidence collection procedure standard,unreasonable evidence collection method and standard.In order to ensure the legitimacy and effectiveness,activity network forensics is endowed with collection of electronic data evidence ability and the strong force,from two aspects of basic principles and concrete rules for legislation to be perfect at this stage,the network forensics obtain professional personnel to promote the support of,operational procedures and scientific standard of inspection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13