民事案件律师调查取证权的困境与路径  

Dilemma and Path of the Right of Civil Lawyers to Investigate and Collect Evidence

作　　者：哈书菊[1] 张书博 HA Shu-ju;ZHANG Shu-bo(School of Law,Heilongjiang University,Harbin 150080,China;Beijing Yingke〈Harbin〉Law Firm,Harbin 150090,China)

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学法学院,哈尔滨150080 [2]北京市盈科〈哈尔滨〉律师事务所,哈尔滨150090

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期30-35,共6页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：黑龙江省哲学社会科学基金项目“地方立法与法治龙江”(18FXB016)。

摘　　要：目前中国证据收集制度仍不完善,虽然在《律师法》和《民事诉讼法》中明确规定了律师的调查取证权,但并未规定该权利受到侵害时的救济措施,也未对律师调查令等相关制度作出明确规定,实践中律师调查取证仍旧十分困难。民事诉讼中保障律师调查取证权对于查清案件事实、依法公正裁判具有重要意义。应当在立法上设置科学的制度体系,在民事诉讼中建立健全律师调查取证权制度。完善律师调查取证权的授予制度、律师调查令制度、滥用调查取证权的追责制度以及明确规定相关协助主体义务的法定性。At present, China’s evidence collection system is still not perfect. Although the lawyer’s law and the civil procedure law clearly stipulate the lawyer’s right to investigate and collect evidence, there are no provisions on the relief measures when the rights are infringed, and there are no clear provisions on the lawyer’s investigation order and other relevant systems. In practice, it is still very difficult for lawyers to investigate and collect evidence. The protection of lawyers’ right of investigation and evidence collection in civil litigation is of great significance for finding out the facts of a case and making a fair judgment according to law. We should set up a scientific system in legislation and establish a sound system in civil litigation. This paper puts forward solutions from the following aspects: perfecting the grant system of lawyer’s right of investigation and evidence collection, the system of lawyer’s investigation orderand the accountability system of abusing the right of investigation and evidence collection, and clearly stipulating the legal nature of the obligations of relevant assistance subjects.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 律师 调查取证权 律师调查令制度 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]