郝敬对朱子《四书》学的改造及其时代意义  

Hao Jing’s Academic Transformation of Zhu Zi’s Theory of Four Books and Its Era Significance

作　　者：江鎏渤 JIANG Liubo(School of Humanities,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学人文学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《浙江海洋大学学报（人文科学版）》2020年第5期47-54,共8页Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University(Humanities Sciences)

摘　　要：晚明心学流行、经义荒阁。经学家郝敬深感于作为官方权威的朱子《四书》学不能纠正此种弊端,决意对其进行改造。郝氏推原心学来自理学之《四书》合纂、偏上遗下,并由文本而至思想改造朱子《四书》学:在文本上,反对朱子视《四书》有阙、衍、脱等文本问题的论断,着意维护其文本的完整性,并逐渐解构《四书》文本,促进《学》《庸》的礼学化;在思想上,采取了不同于朱子解释《四书》的学术着眼点,受心学触发却最终转入实学一路。郝敬对朱子《四书》学的改造有激而然,侧面集结了朱子学群体的反思与反击,由此引发了清初朱子学的复兴,生动呈现出明清之际的学术动态。In late Ming Dynasty,the philosophy of the mind was popular and Confucian classics had not been fully studied.Having deeply felt that Zhu Zi’s theory of Four Books,an official authoritativeness,could not correct this drawback,the Confucian scholar Hao Jing was determined to transform it.Hao Jing believed that the philosophy of the mind came from the combined compilation of Neo-Confucianism Four Books,trying to transform Zhu Zi’s theory of Four Books.In terms of texts,he was opposed to the fact that Zhu Zi regarded Four Books as such text problems as vacancy,redundancy and escape,etc.,taking pains to maintain the integrity of its text and gradually deconstructing the text of Four Books so as to promote the change of meaning of Great Learning and The Doctrine of Mean into ritual study.In terms of thought,he adopted an academic focus different from Zhu Zi’s interpretation of Four Books.Triggered by the mind learning,he finally shifted to real learning.Hao Jing’s academic transformation focusing on Zhu Zi’s theory of Four Books was radical,which gathered the reflection and counterattack of Zhu Zi’s philosophy group,from which the revival of Zhu Zi’s philosophy was triggered in the early Qing Dynasty,vividly demonstrating the academic trends in Ming and Qing Dynasties.

关 键 词：郝敬 《四书》 改造 

分 类 号：B248.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]