检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹兴军 CAO Xingjun(Department of Stomatology of Jinzhou Central Hospital,Jinzhou 121000 Liaoning,China)
出 处:《中国民康医学》2020年第24期15-16,19,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:观察切开复位内固定术治疗颌面骨骨折患者的效果。方法:选取71例颌面骨骨折患者作为研究对象,依据交替分组法分为对照组(35例,采取颌间固定术治疗)和观察组(36例,采取切开复位内固定术治疗)。对比两组治疗持续时间、术后颞颌关节功能严重影响率、术后并发症发生率(张口偏斜、咬合错乱、口臭、关节症状、面神经损伤)和治疗效果。结果:观察组治疗持续时间为(2.11±0.58)周,明显短于对照组的(3.74±0.74)周,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。观察组颞颌关节功能严重影响率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.043)。观察组张口偏斜、咬合错乱、口臭、关节症状和面神经损伤等并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗优良率为94.44%(34/36),高于对照组的71.43%(25/35),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:切开复位内固定术治疗颌面骨骨折患者可提高治疗优良率,缩短治疗持续时间,以及降低颞颌关节功能严重影响率和术后并发症发生率的效果优于颌间固定术治疗效果。Objective:To explore effects of open reduction and internal fixation on patients with maxillofacial fractures.Methods:71 patients with maxillofacial bone fractures were selected as the research objects,and were divided into control group(35 cases,treated with intermaxillary fixation)and observation group(36 cases,treated with open reduction and internal fixation)according to the alternating grouping method.The treatment duration,postoperative temporomandibular joint function severe impact rate,postoperative complication rate(opening deviation,occlusal disturbance,bad breath,joint symptoms,and facial nerve injury)and treatment effects were compared between the two groups.Results:The treatment duration in the observation group was(2.11±0.58)weeks,which was significantly shorter than the control group of(3.74±0.74)weeks,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.000).The postoperative temporomandibular joint function severe impact rate in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.043).The incidence rates of complications such as opening deviation,occlusal disturbance,bad breath,joint symptoms,and facial nerve injury in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The excellent and good rate of treatment in the observation group was 94.44%(34/36),which was higher than 71.43%(25/35)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:Open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of maxillofacial bone fractures can improve the excellent and good rate of treatment,shorten the treatment duration,and reduce the postoperative temporomandibular joint function severe impact rate and postoperative complication rate.Moreover,it is superior to intermaxillary fixation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49