检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾肃 Gu Su
机构地区:[1]复旦大学社会科学高等研究院,上海200433 [2]南京大学哲学系
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2021年第1期45-51,共7页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“当代政治哲学平等正义理论研究”(17BZX082)。
摘 要:在分配正义问题上,左翼自由至上主义者主张完全的自我所有权和自然资源的共同平等拥有。他们广义地解释关于自然资源使用的洛克条件(即“给他人留下足够的、同样好的东西”),主张这是要求给他人留下足够的获取福利的机会,至少在使用或占有自然资源时所获得的福利的机会一样。这就要求那些没有留下如此好条件的人向被剥夺了公平份额的人付出其超出部分的完全有竞争力的价值。在自由与平等的关系问题上,左翼自由至上主义不同意两者冲突的理论,而认为两者是相容的,即在福利的机会平等的条件下允许个人使用自然资源,同时又不丧失个人的自我所有权。这就与左派激进理论和右翼自由至上主义区别了开来,显出其独特的理论诉求。On the issue of distributive justice,Left-Libertarianists hold complete self-ownership and common,equal ownership of natural resources.Broadly explaining the Lockean proviso(“enough and as good be left for others”),they insist that it is to leave enough opportunity of gaining welfare to others,at least as the same opportunity of getting welfare in utilizing or possessing natural resources.That requires those who have not left enough and as good conditions to pay a completely competitive value for his surplus to those who are deprived of a fair share.On the relationship between freedom and equality,Left-Libertarianists disagree with the view that they are in conflict,hold that they are compatible,which means that individuals are allowed to utilize natural resources under the condition of equal opportunity for welfare,while they do not lose personal self-ownership.That shows its unique theoretical appeal different from either radical Leftism or Right-libertarianism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.0.242