检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜宇辉[1] Jiang Yuhui
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2021年第1期52-61,共10页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“当代法国哲学的审美维度研究”(17BZX015)。
摘 要:生命在当下的时代,已经越来越变成固步自封、束缚创造的惯性模式和价值预设。这尤其在德勒兹式的生命主义那里达到极致。对德勒兹主义进行批判性反思,既要基于技术与生命彼此纠葛的悖谬现实,又要回归其思想发展的内在脉络。从“内在生命”到“欲望-机器”,观念论和生命论之间看似牢不可破的内在联结却日渐解体,生命亦最终脱离了哲学的掌控,陷入“一切生命皆技术-生命”的困境。梅亚苏的思辨实在论和埃斯波西托的免疫逻辑或许启示出另一种生命论的路向,重新探索对生命说“是”的可能性。In the present era,life has become more and more self-enclosed,with preset values blocking creativity and progress.It reaches its acme especially in Deleuzian vitalism.A critical reflection on Deleuzism should not only be based on the paradoxical reality of the entanglement between technology and life,but also return to the inner vein of its thought development.From“immanence of life”to“desire-machine”,the seemingly unbreakable inner connection between idealism and vitalism gradually disintegrates,and life finally breaks away from the control of philosophy and falls into the dilemma of“all life being artificial life”.Meillassoux's speculative realism and Esposito's immune logic may provide us another life theory for re-exploring the possibility of saying“yes”to life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200