检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王建 WANG Jian(Department of Neurosurgery,XUYI People’s Hospital,Huaian 211700,China)
机构地区:[1]盱眙县人民医院神经外科,江苏淮安211700
出 处:《中国医学伦理学》2021年第1期93-96,共4页Chinese Medical Ethics
摘 要:终末期患者对维生医疗选择的问题是现代社会新出现的问题,而法律尚未对其进行有效规制。在法治缺位的情况下,一方面,终末期患者行使拒绝维生医疗权可能遭遇阻碍;另一方面,拒绝维生医疗权行使不当还有滥用的风险,即终末期患者愿意接受或应当接受维生医疗而无法实施维生医疗。不尊重终末期患者拒绝维生医疗意愿的事例在现实中大量存在。终末期患者的维生医疗权作为一项新兴的权利诉求,在赋予其权利之名前,也有必要对其正当性进行研究。在试论证终末期患者维生医疗选择权的正当性时,从医学、伦理、法律三个角度予以阐述,分析和肯定了终末期患者维生医疗选择权的正当性,为今后终末期患者维生医疗选择权的实现奠定了一定的理论基础。There is a new problem of terminal patients’choice of life-sustaining medical treatment in modern society,but it has not been regulated effectively by law.In the absence of the rule of law,on the one hand,the terminal patients may encounter obstacles in exercising their right to refuse medical support;on the other hand,there is a risk of abuse if the right to refuse to support the medical care is not exercised properly,which means that terminal patients who are willing or should receive subsistence care are unable to perform it.There are many cases of disrespecting the willingness of terminal patients to refuse medical support.As an emerging right demand,it is essential to study the legitimacy of terminal patients’right to sustain their health care before granting the right.In proving the legitimacy of the right of life-sustaining medical options for terminal patients,this paper expounded from the three perspectives of medicine,ethics,and law.In addition,this paper analyzed and affirmed the legitimacy of the right of life-sustaining medical option for terminal patients,and lays a certain theoretical foundation for the realization of the right of life-sustaining medical option for terminal patients in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222