检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谷永超[1] 赵迈 GU Yong-chao;ZHAO Mai(Law School of Henan University,Kaifeng,Henan 475001)
出 处:《怀化学院学报》2020年第6期66-69,共4页Journal of Huaihua University
基 金:中国法学会2019年度部级法学研究自选课题“英美刑法中的平均人标准研究”(CLS(2019)D20)。
摘 要:人工智能技术的飞速发展推动了文学艺术的创新,也给涉人工智能著作权的刑法保护带来了挑战。人工智能生成物符合《著作权法》关于作品的界定,属于侵犯著作权罪的犯罪对象。在著作权归属上赋权给人工智能的所有者,能保证产业链条的完整性,实现利益最大化。人工智能在生成作品的过程中侵犯他人的著作权,应由人工智能的设计者或使用者承担侵犯著作权罪的刑事责任,同时应明确设计者或使用者的预见义务或监督义务。The rapid development of artificial intelligence technology promotes the innovation of literature and art,and also challenges the criminal law protection of artificial intelligence copyright.Artificial intelligence products conform to the definition of works in the copyright law and belong to the criminal object of copyright infringement crime.In terms of copyright ownership,empowering the ownership of artificial intelligence creators can ensure the integrity of the industrial chain and maximize the interests.If the artificial intelligence infringes the copyright of others in the process of producing works,the designer or user of the artificial intelligence should bear the criminal responsibility of the crime of infringing copyright.At the same time,the designer or user of the artificial intelligence should be strict with the obligation of foreseeing or supervising.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28