检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵彦锋[1] ZHAO Yanfeng(School of E-commerce and Logistics Management,Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou,Henan 450046,China)
机构地区:[1]河南财经政法大学电子商务学院,河南郑州450046
出 处:《财经理论与实践》2021年第1期62-69,共8页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(19AGL011);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2020BJJ008)。
摘 要:基于2011-2018年沪深A股上市公司样本,实证检验超额商誉对审计收费的影响以及高管激励的调节效应。研究表明:超额商誉提高了审计收费,且在民营企业更显著;而高管不同激励方式对超额商誉与审计收费的调节具有异质性:股权激励具有抑制作用,而薪酬激励具有增强效应;从作用机制来看,超额商誉通过增加经营风险和审计投入,进而提高审计收费。Taking Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2018 as samples,this paper empirically tests the impact of excess goodwill on audit fees.The findings are as follows:the excess goodwill increases audit fees and this effect is more significant in private enterprises;different executive incentive methods have different adjustment directions for the relationship between excess goodwill and audit fees:the equity incentive has inhibitory effect,while the compensation incentive has enhancement effect;from the perspective of mechanism,excess goodwill increases operational risk,and auditors need to increase input,which further affects audit fees.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222