检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨翔[1] 雷勇[1] YANG Xiang;LEI Yong(Faculty of Law, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China)
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2021年第1期116-121,共6页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金应急管理体系建设研究专项项目“突发公共卫生事件中涉疫矛盾纠纷的防范与化解研究”(20VYJ043)阶段性成果。
摘 要:民事诉讼复议制度是我国特有的一项程序性权利救济制度,具有救济及时、高效、成本低等特点。因我国现行民事诉讼法对复议制度规定存在功能定位不明,适用范围狭窄,运行程序缺失,与其他相关制度关系界定模糊等不足,使其实践功能得不到有效发挥。对此,需要从立法角度明确复议的功能定位,科学界分复议与其他相关制度间的关系,适当扩大复议的适用范围,合理设计复议的运行程序,规范复议裁决文书的制作等,以期实现民事诉讼复议立法与司法的契合。The review system is a unique civil relief system for procedural right in China.It has the characteristics of timely relief,high efficiency and low cost.But the review system in China’s current civil procedure law has some shortcomings,such as unclear function orientation,narrow scope of application,lack of operation procedure,vague definition of its relationship with other relevant systems.As a result,its practical function cannot be effectively played.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the function of the review system,scientifically distinguish the relationship between the review system and other relevant systems,appropriately expand the scope of application for the review system,and reasonably design the process of the review system from the perspective of legislation,so as to achieve the agreement between legislation and review system of justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.118.216