检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄晓彬 HUANG Xiao-bin(Law School of Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China)
出 处:《河南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第1期71-79,共9页Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
摘 要:《关于适用认罪认罚从宽制度的指导意见》第26条第一次将“释明”这一概念引入刑事诉讼,但认罪认罚从宽作为中国新出现的制度,与传统的对抗司法有所不同,与民事诉讼在诉讼模式、价值理念和诉讼目的上更是有较大的差异,意味着认罪认罚从宽制度下检察释明义务难以完全借鉴民事诉讼中的释明制度。认罪认罚从宽制度下检察释明义务的构建需要遵循其自身特有的价值原则,从原则、范围、阶段和法律后果上进行设计。The 26 clause in the Guidance on the Application of the Leniency System of Confession and Punishment introduces the concept of interpretation into criminal proceedings for the first time.As a new system in China,leniency system of confession and punishment is different from the traditional adversarial justice system,and it is quite different from the civil litigation model,value concept and litigation purpose.It means that it is difficult for the obligation of prosecutorial interpretation to have successful experiences of the interpretation system in civil litigation to go by.The construction of the obligation of prosecutorial interpretation needs to follow its own unique value principles and design from the principles,scope,stages and legal consequences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26