中体西用与和魂洋才的差异及其成因——一条反思中日近现代化不同命运的路径  

On the Difference between“zhongti xiyong”and“hehun yangcai”——Reflection on different approaches of China’s and Japan’s modernization

作　　者：叶有韫 YE You-yun(Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,Jiangsu,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期99-103,107,共6页Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：19世纪中日两国近现代化转型关口提出的“中体西用”与“和魂洋才”两种指导思想,结构看似相同,其实潜藏着“体”有形而“魂”无状、“用”依体而“才”自立、“中体与西用割裂”而“和魂与洋才互通”这三点隐而不显的差异。进一步分析差异背后的历史文化成因,又能找到“汉化异族”与“和魂汉才”的经历、“科举制”与“贡举制”的影响、“西学中源”与“西学世源”的思想、“超越文化”与“现实文化”及“圣人文化”与“人神文化”这五点关键因素,它们共同决定了近代中日走向不同的道路的必然。In the 19th century,both China and Japan proposed their guiding concept of learning the West for modernization.China brought about“zhongti xiyong”(Western skills on a Chinese base),while Japan took“hehun yangcai”(foreign techniques with Japanese spirit),which look similar in structure,but actually are obscurely different in 3 aspects.First,ti is solid but hun is not.Second,yong is dependent on ti,while cai is independent.Third,zhongti and xiyong are separated,while hehun and yangcai are integrated.More studies to look for the cultural reasons of such difference could trace to 5 critical factors between China’s and Japan’s attitude towards culture and foreign influence.All of them played a decisive part in the different paths of the modernization of China and Japan.

关 键 词：中体西用 和魂洋才 中日近现代化 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]