检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄宇骁 Huang Yuxiao
出 处:《政治与法律》2021年第2期108-125,共18页Political Science and Law
基 金:上海市晨光计划项目“行政法权利理论审视:以行政诉讼原告资格为切入点”(项目编号:20GC16)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:在我国,行政法学理论与实务对行政诉讼受案范围与原告资格关系的认识存在混淆。就受案范围来说,从行为作出结果出发判断是否“实际影响权利义务”,从而界定行为属性的做法,既是循环论证,也是受案范围容易与原告资格混淆的根本原因。正确的逻辑应当是从构成要件出发判断行为属性,“实际影响权利义务”是一个行为属于行政行为之后的当然结果。就原告资格来说,相对人受到行政行为法律效果侵害,遵从行为不法的逻辑,受案范围满足即意味着原告资格的满足。其他利害关系人受到行政行为事实效果侵害,遵从结果不法的逻辑,原告资格判断需要另行从损害结果出发归责行为违法性。受案范围与原告资格纠缠形成的牵连性阶段体系表明,应当探索在终局行为前阶段构建定分止争制度。There is confusion in the relationship between the scope of cases accepted and the qualification as a plaintiff of an administrative litigation in the theory and practice of the administrative law.As far as the scope of cases accepted is concerned,the practice of determining whether rights and obligations are actually influenced from the result of an act and thus defining the nature of such act is not only a circular argumentation,but also the root cause of being confused with the qualification as a plaintiff.The correct logic should be as follows:the nature of an act should be determined according to the constituent elements,and the"actual influence on rights and obligations"is the natural result after an act is determined as an administrative act.As far as the qualification as a plaintiff is concerned,if the counterparty is infringed by the legal effect of an administrative act,by following the logic in the unlawfulness of an act,falling under the scope of cases accepted means the satisfaction of the qualification as a plaintiff.If other interested parties are infringed by the factual effect of an administrative act,by following the logic in the unlawfulness of consequence,the judgment on qualification as a plaintiff shall be made separately from the result of damage to impute the unlawfulness of an act.The linking stage system formed by the entanglement of the scope of cases accepted and the qualification as a plaintiff indicates that the dispute settlement system should be established in the pre-stage of a final act.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.113